Bonner Online-Bibliographie zur Comicforschung

WIKINDX Resources

Abbott, Michael und Charles Forceville: "Visual representation of emotion in manga. ‘Loss of control is loss of hands’ in Azumanga Daioh Volume 4." In: Language and Literature 20.2 (2011), S. 91–112. 
Added by: joachim (14 Jan 2014 10:53:27 UTC)   Last edited by: joachim (14 Jan 2014 11:01:11 UTC)
Resource type: Journal Article
Languages: englisch
Peer reviewed
DOI: 10.1177/0963947011402182
BibTeX citation key: Abbott2011
Email resource to friend
View all bibliographic details
Categories: General
Keywords: "Azumanga Daioh", Azuma. Kiyohiko, Japan, Kognition, Körper, Manga, Metapher
Creators: Abbott, Forceville
Collection: Language and Literature
Views: 6/200
Views index: 8%
Popularity index: 2%
Attachments  
Abstract
Comics and manga have many ways to convey the expression of emotion, ranging from exaggerated facial expressions and hand/arm positions to the squiggles around body parts that Kennedy (1982) calls ‘pictorial runes’. According to Ekman at least some emotions – happiness, surprise, fear, sadness, anger, disgust – are universal, but this is not necessarily the case for their expression in comics and manga. While many of the iconic markers and pictorial runes that Forceville (2005) charted in an Asterix album to indicate that a character is angry occur also in Japanese manga, Shinohara and Matsunaka also found markers and runes that appear to be typical for manga. In this article we examine an unusual signal conveying that a character is emotionally affected in Volume 4 of Kiyohiko Azuma’s Azumanga Daioh: the ‘loss of hands’. Our findings (1) show how non-facial information helps express emotion in manga; (2) demonstrate how hand loss contributes to the characterization of Azuma’s heroines; (3) support the theorization of emotion in Conceptual Metaphor Theory.
  
wikindx 5.2.beta 1 ©2017 | Total resources: 10830 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: Comicforschung-Bibliographie Stil (CFB) | Database queries: 56 | DB execution: 0.36678 secs | Script execution: 0.38888 secs